<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:theport="http://www.theport.com/namespace">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[dave's Blog]]></title>
    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <link>http://my.journaltimes.com/racinenativemn/blog</link>
    
    	
    <theport:trustEnabled>yes</theport:trustEnabled>
    <theport:replaceVars>yes</theport:replaceVars>   
  	
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://my.journaltimes.com/post/racinenativemn/blog/media_double_standard.html</guid>
	
      <title><![CDATA[Media double standard? - Correction made. Thanks house. ]]></title>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Obama has already hit the golf course 24 times in his presidency...Bush&amp;nbsp;24 times in 8 years.&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;P&gt;Obama attended 22 democratic fundraisers so far....Bush 6 in 8 years.&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;P&gt;Obama has yet to visit New Orleans for more than 4 hours.&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;P&gt;Mainstream media would have a field day with this if Bush was president. But since media won't report this on the Messiah. I thought i would blog about it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:51:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <theport:alertlevel>0</theport:alertlevel>
      	
      	
    </item>
 	
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://my.journaltimes.com/post/racinenativemn/blog/pleaseonly_boos_at_favres_return_to_green_bay_on_sunday.html</guid>
	
      <title><![CDATA[Please...Only Boos at Favre's return to Green Bay on Sunday. ]]></title>
      <description>I was just wondering if anyone is going to cheer when Favre comes onto the field at Lambeau. I most certainly hope not. We need to give him the loudest boos we have ever given anyone. Go Green Bay!!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:06:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <theport:alertlevel>0</theport:alertlevel>
      	
      	
    </item>
 	
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://my.journaltimes.com/post/racinenativemn/blog/drug_raid_41_busted_anyone_know_any_of_the_people_involved.html</guid>
	
      <title><![CDATA[Drug Raid - 41 busted. Anyone know any of the people involved? ]]></title>
      <description>I know one of the guys still at large. I remember when i was younger he punched a special needs kid in the face. I was sick to my stomach. What comes around goes around. Karma's a b***</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:01:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <theport:alertlevel>0</theport:alertlevel>
      	
      	
    </item>
 	
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://my.journaltimes.com/post/racinenativemn/blog/anita_dunn_obama_advisor_we_controlled_the_media.html</guid>
	
      <title><![CDATA[Anita Dunn - Obama advisor &quot;We controlled the media&quot; ]]></title>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Obama campaign's press strategy leading up to his election last November focused on &quot;making&quot; the media cover what the campaign wanted and on exercising absolute &quot;control&quot; over coverage, White House Communications Director Anita Dunn told an overseas crowd early this year.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;P&gt;In a video of the event, Dunn is seen describing in detail the media strategy used by then-Sen. Barack Obama's highly disciplined presidential campaign. The video is footage from a Jan. 12 forum hosted by the Global Foundation for Democracy and Development in the Dominican Republic.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;P&gt;&quot;Very rarely did we communicate through the press anything that we didn't absolutely control,&quot; Dunn said, admitting that the strategy &quot;did not always make us popular in the press.&quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;P&gt;The video drew attention after Dunn kicked off a war of words with Fox News last Sunday, calling the network &quot;opinion journalism masquerading as news.&quot; The White House stopped providing guests to &quot;Fox News Sunday&quot; in August after host Chris Wallace fact-checked controversial assertions made by Tammy Duckworth, assistant secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;P&gt;Dunn complained about the fact-checking last Sunday. In the January forum, she provided details about the lengths to which the Obama campaign went to control the media message.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;P&gt;She explained that the campaign favored live interviews so that Obama's words could not be edited -- &quot;so that what the voters heard we determined, as opposed to some editor in a TV station.&quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;P&gt;She said Campaign Manager David Plouffe put out Web videos so the campaign could avoid talking to reporters and focus the media message.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;P&gt;&quot;Whether it was a David Plouffe video or an Obama speech, a huge part of our press strategy was focused on making the media cover what Obama was actually saying as opposed to why the campaign was saying it,&quot; she said. &quot;One of the reasons we did so many of the David Plouffe videos was not just for our supporters, but also because it was a way for us to get our message out without having to actually talk to reporters. ... We just put that out there and made them write what Plouffe had said as opposed to Plouffe doing an interview with a reporter. So it was very much we controlled it as opposed to the press controlled it.&quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SOmkwJpj4Y&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SOmkwJpj4Y&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <theport:alertlevel>0</theport:alertlevel>
      	
      	
    </item>
 	
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://my.journaltimes.com/post/racinenativemn/blog/nobel_peace_prize_whats_next.html</guid>
	
      <title><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize. What's next? ]]></title>
      <description>Academy Award?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:06:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <theport:alertlevel>0</theport:alertlevel>
      	
      	
    </item>
 	
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://my.journaltimes.com/post/racinenativemn/blog/we_know_most_politicians_have_no_intent_on_upholding_the_con.html</guid>
	
      <title><![CDATA[We know most politicians have no intent on upholding the Constitution. ]]></title>
      <description>What is your biggest beef with politicians not upholding the Constitution as the founders originally intended?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:24:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <theport:alertlevel>0</theport:alertlevel>
      	
      	
    </item>
 	
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://my.journaltimes.com/post/racinenativemn/blog/why_would_the_world_reject_the_wannabe_president_of_the_worl.html</guid>
	
      <title><![CDATA[Why would the world reject the wanna-be president of the world? Olympics in Chicago eliminated first round. ]]></title>
      <description>This isn't Bush trying to bring the Olympics to Chicago. Its Barack Hussein Obama.... MMMM MMMMM MMMMMM</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <theport:alertlevel>0</theport:alertlevel>
      	
      	
    </item>
 	
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://my.journaltimes.com/post/racinenativemn/blog/childrens_games_leap_blog_frogi_prefer_duckduckgooseme.html</guid>
	
      <title><![CDATA[Childrens games - Leap Blog Frog...I prefer duck-duck-goose-me. ]]></title>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Which childrens game do you play? Nanny nanny boo-boo! Oh by the way:&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;DIV class=normaltxt12&gt;'With the White House zeroing in on the insurance-industry practice of discriminating against clients based on pre-existing conditions, administration allies are calling attention to how broadly insurers interpret the term to maximize profits.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    It turns out that in eight states, plus the District of Columbia, getting beaten up by your spouse is a pre-existing condition.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    Under the cold logic of the insurance industry, it makes perfect sense: If you are in a marriage with someone who has beaten you in the past, you're more likely to get beaten again than the average person and are therefore more expensive to insure.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    In human terms, it's a second punishment for a victim of domestic violence.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    In 2006, Democrats tried to end the practice. An amendment introduced by Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), now a member of leadership, split the Health Education Labor &amp;amp; Pensions Committee 10-10. The tie meant that the measure failed.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    All ten no votes were Republicans, including Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyoming), a member of the &quot;Gang of Six&quot; on the Finance Committee who are hashing out a bipartisan bill. A spokesman for Enzi didn't immediately return a call from Huffington Post.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    At the time, Enzi defended his vote by saying that such regulations could increase the price of insurance and make it out of reach for more people. &quot;If you have no insurance, it doesn't matter what services are mandated by the state,&quot; he said, according to a CQ Today item from March 15th, 2006.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for an insurance industry trade group, America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), said that the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has proposed ending the discrimination. &quot;The NAIC has a model on this that we strongly supported. That model bans the use of a person's status as a victim of domestic violence in making a decision on coverage,&quot; he said.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    During the last health care reform push, in 1993 and 1994, the industry similarly promised to end discrimination against people with pre-existing conditions.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    Murray pushed to include the domestic violence concern in this year's comprehensive health care bill. &quot;Senator Murray continues to believe that victims of domestic violence should not be punished for the crimes of their abusers. That is why she worked to include language in the Senate HELP Committee's health insurance reform bill that would ban this discriminatory and harmful insurance company practice,&quot; said spokesman Eli Zupnick.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    In 1994, then-Rep. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), now a member of Senate leadership, had his staff survey 16 insurance companies. He found that eight would not write health, life or disability policies for women who have been abused. In 1995, the Boston Globe found that Nationwide, Allstate, State Farm, Aetna, Metropolitan Life, The Equitable Companies, First Colony Life, The Prudential and the Principal Financial Group had all either canceled or denied coverage to women who'd been beaten.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    The Service Employees International Union asked members to write letters to Congress regarding the exclusion and have quickly generated hundreds, says an SEIU spokeswoman.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    The relevant provision:&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    SEC. 2706. PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES BASED ON HEALTH STATUS.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    '(a) IN GENERAL.--A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage may not establish rules for eligibility (including continued eligibility) of any individual to enroll under the terms of the plan or coverage based on any of the following health status-related factors in relation to the individual or a dependent of the individual:&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    (1) Health status.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    (2) Medical condition (including both physical and mental illnesses).&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    (3) Claims experience.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    (4) Receipt of health care.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    (5) Medical history.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    (6) Genetic information.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    (7) Evidence of insurability (including conditions arising out of acts of domestic violence).&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    (8) Disability.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    (9) Any other health status-related factor determined appropriate by the Secretary.&lt;BR&gt;
    &lt;BR&gt;
    UPDATE: The eight states that still allow it are Idaho, Mississippi, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota and Wyoming, according to a report by the National Women's Law Center.'&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <theport:alertlevel>0</theport:alertlevel>
      	
      	
    </item>
 
  </channel>
</rss>
