February 2008
Wednesday February 27, 2008
Packers won't pursue Faneca
Posted by: gwoelfel at 8:52PM CST on February 27, 2008

BY GERY WOELFEL

Ever since opting not to re-sign Mike Wahle and Marco Rivera three years ago, Packers general manager Ted Thompson has failed miserably to find suitable replacements for them.

Last week, in a published report, Thompson admitted he hasn’t done a good job of addressing what is arguably the most glaring deficiency on the team.

As such, there has been speculation Thompson would try to finally rectify the problem and make a major pitch for a prime-time guard during the upcoming free-agency period, which commences Friday.

And Thompson might still do that, although he won’t be landing the biggest fish in the free-agent guard pond: Alan Faneca.

Rick Smith, Faneca’s agent, told me Wednesday he had contacted the Packers, knowing they are in the market for a quality guard.

Smith said the discussions didn’t last long.

“They have no interest at all,’’ Smith said. “None.’’

And that’s absurd. Faneca is a special player. He was a seven-time Pro Bowl selection for the Pittsburgh Steelers.

At 31 and still in great health, he could have instantly plugged a gaping hole in the Packers’ offensive line.

Faneca just might have been the player the Packers needed to get over the hump and into the Super Bowl next season.

It would be understandable if Thompson didn’t court Faneca because the Packers didn’t have the financial wherewithal. But they do. The Packers will reportedly be a whopping $25 million under the salary cap.

If Thompson doesn’t have an iota of interest in Faneca, one of the most coveted players in free agency, it’ll be interesting to see if he has any interest in any free agents at all.


Tuesday February 26, 2008
Could Packers' pick be Rodgers-Cromartie?
Posted by: gwoelfel at 2:28PM CST on February 26, 2008

BY GERY WOELFEL

INDIANAPOLIS – The educated guess among some NFL officials attending the NFL Draft combine is the Green Bay Packers will use their first-round pick in this year’s draft on a defensive back or possibly an outside linebacker.

If the Packers go the db route, they are likely to consider Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie of Tennessee State.

While Rodgers-Cromartie labored at a relatively-small school, he clearly showed he has big-time potential with an outstanding performance at the Senior Bowl.

Physically, Rodgers-Cromartie seems to have the tools necessary to excel at the NFL level. He has the ideal height at 6-foot-2.

“That’s a great advantage for me,’’ said the affable Rodgers-Cromartie. “It’s hard for quarterbacks to drop the ball over me.’’

And Rodgers-Cromartie has the speed. Amazing speed. He clams he ran a blistering 4.26 40-yard dash as a junior.

There is another appealing quality to Rodgers-Cromartie’s game: He is a playmaker. He had 11 picks at Tennessee State.

Compound that productivity with his mind-set of transforming every interception into a touchdown -- “Every time I get my hands on the ball, that’s all I’m thinking.’’ – and you can see why Rodgers-Cromartie’s stock is soaring.

Rodgers-Cromartie, who has the versatility to play cornerback or safety, told me that Jacksonville, which picks 26th, and Dallas, which picks 28th, have shown the most interest in him.

He also noted New England has also been highly interested, although the Patriots don’t have a late first-round pick.

While Rodgers-Cromartie said he hasn’t talked to any Packers officials, he was fairly sure the Packers were interested him because… “my coach said they did.’’


Saturday February 16, 2008
Bucks are in total disarray
Posted by: gwoelfel at 5:31PM CST on February 16, 2008

BY GERY WOELFEL

Before the Milwaukee Bucks’ game against the New Orleans Wednesday night at the Bradley Center, I posed the following question to Bucks coach Larry Krystkowiak:

"Do you expect the Bucks to make any trades before the Feb. 21 deadline?

Krystkowiak paused and responded, "I would say no.’’

A few seconds later, he added, "I think we can get it fixed with this group.’’

Apparently, Krystkowiak sees something that neither I nor any other follower of his dysfunctional "group’’ has seen. The Bucks’ are an abysmal 19-34 and, while that pathetic record speaks volumes, it doesn’t accurately tell the whole sad story about how this team is in disarray.

Consider:

+ The Bucks have lost four straight, seven of their last eight and 14 of 18.

+ The Bucks lost to an average Toronto team by 31 points.

+ They lost to a below-average Philadelphia team by 43 points.

+ They lost not once but twice to the putrid New York Knicks – and, on both occasions, they squandered 17-point leads.

+ They were absolutely annihilated in their two games against the Detroit Pistons: 114-69 (that’s a 45-point spanking) and 117-91 (a "mere’’ 26-point thrashing).

Do I believe Krystkowiak believes, in his heart of hearts, this team can magically turn it around? Not at all. Ron Paul has a better chance of heading to the White House than the Bucks have of rectifying their myriad problems.

I believe Krystkowiak now as much as I did when I asked him a couple of months ago why he suddenly scrapped using the triangle offense. Krystkowiak loves the triangle offense, having learned it from the master, Tex Winter.

In a couple of conversations after last season, I couldn’t help but sense the excitement in his voice when he talked about implementing the triangle offense and how it would benefit so many Bucks like Andrew Bogut and Michael Redd and Mo Williams.

The Bucks began using the triangle offense during the Las Vegas Summer League, and Krystkowiak continued to use it during training camp and in preseason games. He liked what he saw.

But then, poof, it was gone. Completely gone.

Why? Who really knows? Krystkowiak never gave any legit reason, stating only that it was a nice instructional tool for getting his players to share the ball.

Several players and other Bucks’ personnel contend it wasn’t Krystkowiak’s decision to abandon the triangle. In their minds, he was instructed to change the offense and that the mandate came from Bucks owner Herb Kohl.

But trashing the triangle offense is just the tip of the iceberg concerning the Bucks’ problems. This team, since it congregated for training camp, has never been on the same page.

In hindsight, management’s bungling of Charlie Bell’s contract negotiations over the summer had an adverse effect that snowballed over into the winter. Instead of immediately giving Bell an offer that was commensurate with his quality of play from last season, Bucks owner Herb Kohl and his negotiating team — which includes Ron Walter, the vice president-alternative governor, and Mike Burr, the chief financial officer — dragged its feet on a contract that should have been finalized relatively quickly.

Bell, a good person who doesn’t create waves, was so upset by the way he was treated that he sincerely didn’t want to play for the Bucks. His bitterness has since subsided but only after a series of sub-par performances.

But this wasn’t the first time the Bucks’ negotiating team has rankled someone over the years. I’ve had discussions with several former Bucks general managers, coaches and agents and they revealed their frustrations in how contractual matters were handled.

According to several NBA execs, the Bucks are believed to be one of only two teams in the NBA that negotiate trades, contracts, etc. by committee. The other is the Los Angeles Clippers. Need more be said?

Additionally, NBA folks have told me in recent weeks that Bucks general manager Larry Harris has been actively trying to swing a deal and that at least two of his proposed deals, including one involving New York Knicks power forward Zach Randolph, had been nixed by his superiors.

The scuttlebutt circulating the NBA is that Kohl is letting Harris, a lame-duck GM in the final year of his contract, hang out to dry, that Kohl is content to let Harris’ successor commence with the reconstruction of the team this summer.

And those are just some of the front office issues.

There are also profound issues with the coaches and players. Sparks have flown in the locker room on a couple occasions this season, including a heated, post-game exchange between point guard Mo Williams and assistant coach Tony Brown.

When I asked both Williams and Krystkowiak about the ugly incident, they claimed it never existed. But when I asked Brown — and some others in the Bucks’ organization — about the ordeal, they acknowledged it occurred.

Brown downplayed the locker-room blowup and he’s correct in doing so. Blowups aren’t unusual in professional sports. They happen even with good teams.

But the disturbing incident indicated the intense pressure that’s been placed on virtually everyone in the organization — from the GM to the coaches to the players — to produce.

There have been some other not-so-pleasant ‘debates’’ between the players and coaches. Even with the season more than half way over, issues pertaining to playing-time, rotations and the type of offense that should be run — whether it should be centered around Bogut, an exceptional passer for a big man, or it should be predicated on the perimeter shooting of Redd and Williams — have inexcusably yet to be resolved.

It’s been an especially difficult season for Redd, undisputably the Bucks’ best player. After playing with the U.S. Olympic Team over the summer, Redd reported to camp in the best shape, mentally and physically, of his career. He was primed for a banner season for himself and for his team.

But that obviously hasn’t occurred and his frustrations were never demonstrated more clearly than in a recent game against the Los Angeles Clippers.

Redd, one of the most prolific scorers in the NBA, didn’t take one single shot in the entire first quarter. Nor did he make any serious attempt to take one. It marked the first time in his eight-year pro career that’s happened.

How the offense should be run, and the uncertainty regarding those other issues, have prompted some players to privately question Krystkowiak. They wonder whether he is simply too inexperienced for the situation.

Krystkowiak, in his first full season as an NBA head coach, conceded he has learned "a lot’’ already this season. He also admitted he would have done some things differently.

Yet, during this extremely trying time, Krystkowiak has maintained a fairly positive and confident outlook. At least, he has publicly.

But for Krystkowiak to believe his team, as currently constituted, can "fix’’ all their problems is a stretch. Anyone would have harbored the same sentiment if they would have been in the hallway of the Bradley Center after last Wednesday’s game. That’s when Bucks players and coaches seemingly couldn’t exit the facility fast enough.

Charlie Villanueva was probably in his car before most of the fans were. Bobby Simmons wasn’t far behind. Another member of the team, normally a congenial sort, refused to talk to me. His anger and disdain about the Bucks’ dire situation was clearly etched on his face.

So, while several teams have already made trades in recent weeks and with more trades to come, the Bucks brass appears resigned to let this already ugly season become uglier.


Tuesday February 12, 2008
Badgers' Butch will audition for NBA scouts
Posted by: gwoelfel at 4:52PM CST on February 12, 2008

BY GERY WOELFEL

Two years ago, it was Steve Novak.

Last year, it was Carl Landry.

This year, will it be Brian Butch?

Neither Novak nor Landry were given much of a chance of playing in the NBA following their fine collegiate careers at Marquette and Purdue, respectively.

But both Wisconsin products – Novak attended Brown Deer High School and Landry attended Milwaukee Vincent High School – were given an opportunity to showcase their skills before a horde of NBA general managers and scouts by playing in the Portsmouth Invitational Tournament at Portsmouth, Va.

And they seized the moment.

Novak and Landry each turned in impressive showings at the PIT and eventually wound up being second-round selections in the NBA draft: Novak was the 32nd overall pick in the 2006 draft and Landry was the 31st choice in the 2007 draft.

Both Landry and Novak are now collecting nice paychecks from the Houston Rockets.

Like Landry and Novak before him, Butch will now get the chance to prove to NBA personnel that he is worthy of playing in their league.

Mahlon Parker, chairman of the PIT, told me Tuesday that Butch will be one of 64 players in the tournament, which will be held April 9-12.

“We extended an invitation to Brian Butch and he confirmed today that he has accepted it,’’ Parker said. “Brian is a big guy who is fundamentally sound and has played for a good coach (Bo Ryan).

“We’re very happy to have him in our tournament.’’

The 6-foot-11, 235-pound Butch is having a quality season, averaging 12.7 points – second-best on the team – and a team-high 7 rebounds.

Butch, a graduate of Appleton West High School, is shooting .445 from the field and .703 from the free throw line.

Butch’s strong season is one of the major reasons why the Badgers have a 19-4 overall record and 9-2 Big Ten Conference mark.

While Butch is the only player from Wisconsin that has been extended an invitation to the PIT, Parker acknowledged two other players from the state are on a “reserve list’’ in the event other players would decline invitations.

Those players are Marquette center Ousmane Barro who, in 22 games for the Golden Eagles, is averaging 5.3 points and 5.5 rebounds, and Wisconsin guard Michael Flowers who, in 23 games, is averaging 9.3 points.

Butch is one of the first players to accept a PIT invitation. Some others who have committed to playing are Patrick Ewing and Jonathan Wallace, both of Georgetown, and Mike Green and A.J. Graves, both of Butler.

Last year’s PIT attracted more than 200 NBA officials and another 60 scouts from foreign countries.

Said Parker: “The kids who play here realize there’ll be a lot of eyes watching them and that they can help themselves.’’

Landry and Novak would undoubtedly attest to that.


Friday February 8, 2008
Knight shows his true colors
Posted by: gwoelfel at 7:14PM CST on February 8, 2008

BY GERY WOELFEL

Can you imagine how Bobby Knight would have reacted if one of his basketball players over the years had told him he was "tired’’ or that things were maybe getting to be a little too "tough’’ for him to handle and, heaven forbid, that he was quitting?

God only knows what Knight would have done to them. You can safely assume Mount Knight would have erupted and spewed out voluminous amounts of venom.

So it was ironic that Knight, in a television interview, said he resigned at Texas Tech to make the transition for his son, Pat, to replace him more seamless and because "I was kind of tired.’’ Knight then added, "This has been a tough season.’’

So, instead of showing resolve and showing commitment, like Knight always demanded of his players, Knight flat out quit. And he quit in the middle of the season.

Knight couldn’t have waited until after the season and exhibited some honor and loyalty to the Red Raiders program and especially to his players, many of whom probably attended Texas Tech to play for him?

But Knight has always been about himself. He always wants it his way and, when that doesn’t occur, he pouts and becomes a condescending bully.

He has bullied players, he has bullied officials, he has bullied the media and he has bullied virtually anyone else who doesn’t conform to his wishes.

Yet, because Knight has been a highly-successful coach, his supporters over the years have tolerated and even accepted his boorish behavior, conventiently ignoring his numerous transgressions. And they’ll probably continue to do so.

That’s because Knight has made it abundantly clear he has resigned, and not retired, from coaching. He still longs to coach, and you can go to the bank some desperate and misguided university president will grant him that opportunity.

And that’s a shame, for while Knight is the winningest coach in NCAA Division I men’s basketball history, he is one of the all-time classless coaches as well.


Tuesday February 5, 2008
Good news for Yi, Bucks
Posted by: gwoelfel at 3:44PM CST on February 5, 2008

BY GERY WOELFEL

The Milwaukee Bucks are breathing a collective sigh of relief.

Yi Jianlian, the team’s prized rookie from China, doesn’t have any structural damage to his right shoulder and should return to action shortly.

Yi hurt his shoulder early in the game against the Houston Rockets Saturday night.

The 7-foot rookie power forward then underwent a magnetic resonance imaging exam, which revealed no severe damage to the shoulder.

“He’s got a bone bruise,’’ Bucks general manager Larry Harris said Tuesday afternoon. “He's not 100 percent, but he’s feeling a little better.

“We definitely don’t anticipate him playing tonight against Memphis and he’s questionable for the Dallas game (Wednesday night).’’

Yi, the sixth overall choice in last summer’s NBA draft, has started every one of the Bucks’ 48 games this season. He is averaging 9.8 points and 5.8 rebounds per game.

Harris said Yi’s injury wouldn’t prevent him from playing in the NBA’s Rookie-Sophomore game later this month during All-Star weekend in New Orleans.

“That’s far enough away yet that I anticipate he’ll play in that for sure,’’ Harris said.


Saturday February 2, 2008
Patriots will rule -- again
Posted by: gwoelfel at 4:58PM CST on February 2, 2008

BY GERY WOELFEL

The bad news for the Green Bay Packers and PackersNation was that they lost to the New York Giants in the NFC Championship game.

The good news for the Packers and their faithful followers is that they don’t have to play the New England Patriots in Sunday’s Super Bowl.

Instead, it will be Giants from New York who will be reduced to midgets by late Sunday night. The Patriots are superior to the Giants in almost every facet of the game and richly deserve to be two touchdown favorites – if not more.

If the Patriots take Giants wide receiver Plaxico Burress out of the equation – something the Packers miserably failed to do in the NFC title game – Sunday’s showdown could get Phyllis Diller ugly.

PREDICTION: Patriots 30, Giants 17.

Here are some other predictions from some of Racine’s "pigskin gurus.’’ :

* Jim Behling, manager of Carquest Auto Parts: "It could be a boring game. Hopefully, there’ll be enough Patriots turnovers to keep it close or the Patriots will run away with it.’’ PREDICTION: New England 40, New York 27.

* Wayne Unterbrink, assistant manager for Paradise West Lanes: "The Patriots are going to blow them out; they’re just that good. And they’ve been to Super Bowls, too.’’ PREDICTION: New England 45, New York 10.

* Chuck Brandt, owner of Buckets Pub. "I’m thinking New England is going to win. I just think they got the better team. I know the Giants have a good defense, but I don’t think the Giants will be able to stop them. I think the Patriots will pick them apart. PREDICTION: New England 27, Giants 21.

* Lisa McNeish, Cost Cutters stylist: "I want to see Giants upset New England just because they’re an NFC team. I think they’ve got a pretty good chance. I think it’s going to be a pretty good game. PREDICTION: New York 24, New England 21.

* John Dexter, realtor for Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage of Racine: "I like the Giants. I feel they have the momentum going into the Super Bowl and the fact they were not too far off from beating them the last time.’’ PREDICTION: New York 28, New England 23.

* Joe Meredith, funeral director for Meredith Maresh Funeral Home: "I’d like to see the Giants win, but I don’t think it’s going to happen. The Patriots don’t make a lot of mistakes and, unless Michael Strahan and the defense can get to Tom Brady, I think he’s going to pick them apart. PREDICTION: New England 35, New York 10.

* Kyle Jaeger of Racine, a freshman at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee: "I’m taking the Patriots, definitely. Tom Brady will probably throw a couple of touchdown passes to Randy Moss and the Patriots defense will shut down Eli Manning and Brandon Jacobs. PREDICTION: New England 31, New York 17.

* Sister Marian of Racine Dominican Sisters: "I’m looking forward to the game, although I’d be more excited if the Packers were playing in it. But I do expect it to be an exciting game. It might be a close game. I would be happy if the New York Giant would win, even though they beat the Packers. I think it’ll be a challenge for New York, but my hope is they will come to be the winners and I think they will.’’ PREDICTION: New York 24, New England 21.

* Mike Schold, financial planner for M&I Wealth Management: "I think the Patriots are going to win. The Giants and Patriots defenses are pretty equal, but the Patriots are much better on the offensive side.’’ PREDICTION: New England 31, New York 17.

* Gay Phillips, store manager for Jo-Ann Fabrics: "We want to see them have an undefeated season; no one’s ever done it before. They’re going to be 19-0 instead of 18-1.’’ PREDICTION: New England 24, New York 20.

* Pete Turner, manager of Bob Weber Auto Mart: "I really don’t care who wins. I don’t have that much interest in this game. It’s not that interesting; the Packers aren’t playing in it. PREDICTION: New England 37, New York 12.

* John Alia, owner of Salute’s Restaurant: "Green Bay should have been in there, but I just hope it’s a good game, a high-scoring game. New England should win, but I would like to see the Giants win. New England has the better team; they’ve showed it all year long.’’ PREDICTION: New England 37, New York 21.

* Marlene Weichmann, box office assistant for the Racine Theatre Guild: "Obviously, I’m disappointed the Packers aren’t playing in the Super Bowl. New England has dominated the last couple of years, so I’d like to see someone else win it. But New England is just the better team.’’ PREDICTION: New England 34, New York 24.

* Mike Fumo, sales rep for Nelson Electric Supply Company: "I would love to see the Patriots get knocked off. I know they’re undefeated, but I don’t think they compare to Packers’ dynasty teams of the ‘60s. So, I’m going with the Giants, mainly because of my loyalty to the National Football Conference. Plus, New England has dominated so many years, it would be nice to someone else win.’’ PREDICTION: New York 24, New England 17.

* Tony Marino, owner of Vintage Rock Café: "I think there’s going to be a major upset: the New York Giants over the New England Patriots. The Giants are real hot right now and I see Eli (Manning) performing well on the big stage. You can’t underestimate him. And I’m hoping for good Super Bowl commercials because that’s always a big part of watching the game.’’ PREDICTION: New York 28, New England 24.

* Matt Spencer, Racine Heritage Museum assistant: "Actually, I’m hoping the Giants win, because the Patriots have won some titles the last few years. I think we just need a change of pace. I think it’s going to be a pretty close game and that should keep the excitement up.’’ PREDICTION: New York 30, New England 21.

* Robert Koonce, staff assistant for Genesis Behavioral Services: "The Patriots have come too far to turn back now. They have a purpose to win: to complete their perfect season. I think Tom Brady’s going to have a big game. I think Brady and Moss will both have big games.’’ PREDICTION: New England 28, New York 14.

* Josie Paraganian, bartender at Fritz’s Bar: "I love Super Bowls, but I just wish the Packers would be in it. When they lost to the Giants, that drove me nuts. That just broke my heart. I’m a staunch Packers fan, believe me. I’ve been a Packers fan for years now; I’m going to be 84 next week, a young 84, honey. I hope New England loses. I don’t think the New England boys are very nice boys. I think a lot of people have that opinion. That Belichick, he can go and do whatever. … PREDICTION: New York 21, New England 17.


About This Blog
1 rating(s)

Latest Entries
Loading...
Report Photos