Loading...
I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin
Posted by: StormyKnight on July 8, 2009 at 9:20AM CST
I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin
The Republicans bring a knife to a gunfight, and lose again.

By David Kahane

One of the most terrifying moments of my political life came last summer at the Republican convention in St. Paul. No, I don’t mean seeing John McCain careering around the Xcel Energy Center like Eyegore in Young Frankenstein, his face frozen in a Lon Chaney Sr. rictus grin as he reached across the aisle to his erstwhile friends in the media and got his hand bitten off. Rather, I’m referring to the aftermath of Sarah Palin’s outrageous acceptance speech, which whipped up the Rotary Club delegates into a frenzy of white-boy fury that not even heckling by a brave Code Pink embed could deter. Truly a fascist classic and one that sent shivers down our collectivist spines.

Even worse was the glaze of horror on the phizzes of the assembled heroes of the Mainstream Media. Andrea Mitchell — yes, the very same Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington, whose employer saw no conflict of interest at all when she married then Fed pooh-bah Alan Greenspan — stood there gaping like a frog while the rest of the assembled Finemans and Matthewses and Olbermanns scurried around like roaches when the light gets turned on: What the hell just hit us? For one horrible moment, it looked as if the carefully crafted plans of David Axelrod, Rahm Emanuel, George Soros, and the Second Chief Directorate, first department, of the old KGB were about to gang agley.

Not only were we offended at the sheer effrontery of McCain’s pick: How dare the Republicans proffer this déclassée piece of Wasilla trailer trash whose only claim to fame was that she didn’t exercise her right to choose? Where were her degrees from Smith or Barnard, her internships at PETA, the Brookings Institution, or the Young Pioneers? We were also outraged that the Stupid Party had just nominated a completely unqualified candidate nobody had ever heard of, a first-term governor of Alaska whose previous experience consisted of a small-town mayoralty. As opposed to our guy, Barry Soetoro of Mombasa, Djakarta, and Honolulu, a first-term senator nobody had ever heard of, whose previous experience had been as a state senator (D., Daley Machine) in Illinois. After eight long, illegitimate, lawless years of &*^%BUSH$#@! tyranny, how dare you contest this election?

And so the word went out, from that time and place: Eviscerate Sarah Palin like one of her field-dressed moose. Turn her life upside down. Attack her politics, her background, her educational history. Attack her family. Make fun of her husband, her children. Unleash the noted gynecologist Andrew Sullivan to prove that Palin’s fifth child was really her grandchild. Hit her with everything we have: Maureen Dowd of the New York Times, taking a beer-run break from her quixotic search for Mr. Right to drip venom on Sister Sarah; post-funny comic David Letterman, to joke about her and her daughters on national television; Katie Couric, the anchor nobody watches, to give this Alaskan interloper a taste of life in the big leagues; former New York Times hack Todd “Mr. Dee Dee Myers” Purdum, to act as an instrument of Graydon Carter’s wrath at Vanity Fair. Heck, we even burned her church down. Even after the teleological triumph of The One, the assault had to continue, each blow delivered with our Lefty SneerTM (viz.: Donny Deutsch yesterday on Morning Joe), until Sarah was finished.

You know what? It worked! McCain finally succumbed to his long-standing case of Stockholm Syndrome (“My friends, you have nothing to fear from an Obama presidency”), Tina Fey turned Palin into a see-Russia-from-my-house joke, “conservative” useful idiots like Peggy Noonan and Kathleen Parker hatched her, and finally Sarah cried No más and walked away. If we could, we’d cut off her head and mount it on a wall at Tammany Hall, except there is no more Tammany Hall unless you count Obama’s Tony Rezko–financed home in Chicago. And it took only eight months — heck, Sarah couldn't even have another kid in the time it took us to destroy her. That’s the Chicago way!

Yes, my friends, it’s once again time to quote Sean Connery’s famous speech from The Untouchables, written by David Mamet — the lecture the veteran Chicago cop gives a wet-behind-the-ears Eliot Ness (Kevin Costner, back when he was a movie star) while they sit in a church pew. “You want to get Capone? Here’s how you get him: he pulls a knife, you pull a gun, he sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. That’s the Chicago way!” If you just think of us — liberal Democrats — as Capone you’ll begin to understand what we’re up to. And we just put one of yours in the morgue.

I don’t know why I’m telling you this, but maybe now you’re beginning to understand the high-stakes game we’re playing here. This ain’t John McCain’s logrolling senatorial club any more. This is a deadly serious attempt to realize the vision of the 1960s and to fundamentally transform the United States of America. This is the fusion of Communist dogma, high ideals, gangster tactics, and a stunning amount of self-loathing. For the first time in history, the patrician class is deliberately selling its own country down the river just to prove a point: that, yes, we can! This country stinks and we won’t be happy until we’ve forced you to admit it.

In other words, stop thinking of the Democratic Party as merely a political party, because it’s much more than that. We’re not just the party of slavery, segregation, secularism, and sedition. Not just the party of Aaron Burr, Boss Tweed, Richard J. Croker, Bull Connor, Chris Dodd, Richard Daley, Bill Ayers, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and Emperor Barack Hussein Obama II. Not just the party of Kendall “Agent 202” Myers, the State Department official recruited as a Cuban spy along with his wife during the Carter administration. Rather, think of the Democratic Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party.

If you had any sense, you would start using our tactics against us. After all, you have a few lawyers on your side. Sue us. File frivolous ethics complaints against all our elected officials until, like Sarah, they go broke from defending themselves. (David Paterson would be a good place to start.) Challenge the constitutionality of BO2’s legion of fill-in-the-blank czars — none of whom have to be confirmed, or even pass a security check. (Come to think of it, neither did Barry.) Let slip your own journalistic dogs of war, assuming you have any, to find Barry’s birth certificate, his college transcripts, whether he applied to Occidental as a foreign student, and on which passport he traveled in 1981 to Pakistan with his friend Wahid Hamid, for starters.

You might also want to think about interviewing New York literary agent Jane Dystel, who a) contacted the totally unknown Obama in the wake of an adulatory New York Times piece in 1990 and b) got him a $125,000 advance for a memoir that c) he couldn’t write, even after a long sojourn in Bali, which d) got the contract canceled, whereupon e) Dystel got him $40,000 from another publisher, following which f) the book finally came out to glowing reviews and g) Obama fired her. Wouldn’t she have an interesting story to tell?

Of course, you won’t. You’re too nice, too enamored of history and tradition to realize that the rules have changed. Remember, I live and work in a town where, “Hello, he lied,” isn’t a joke; we men of the Left are perfectly comfortable lying, cheating, and stealing — hello, Senator Franken! — in order to attain and keep political power. Not for nothing is one of our mottos, “By Any Means Necessary.” You see, we’re the good guys, and for us the ends always justify the means. We are, literally, shameless, which is why Bill Clinton is now a multi-millionaire and Eliot Spitzer is already on the comeback trail.

In Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, “the fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.” This is the book that “Reset” Rodham (what ever happened to her?) and BHO II grew up reading and continue to live by. If you don’t understand that that’s the way we see you — as the enemy — then you’re too dumb to survive. Remember that for us politics is not just an avocation, or even just a job, but our life. We literally stay awake nights thinking up ways to screw you. And one of the ways we do that is by religiously observing Alinsky’s Rule No. 4.

Did Sarah stand for “family values”? Flay her unwed-mother daughter. Did she represent probity in a notoriously corrupt, one-family state? Spread rumors about FBI investigations. Did she speak with an upper-Midwest twang? Mock it relentlessly on Saturday Night Live. Above all, don’t let her motivate the half of the country that doesn’t want His Serene Highness to bankrupt the nation, align with banana-republic Communist dictators, unilaterally dismantle our missile defenses, and set foot in more mosques than churches since he has become president. We’ve got a suicide cult to run here.

And that’s why Sarah had to go. Whether she understood it or not, she threatened us right down to our most fundamental, meretricious, elitist, sneering, snobbish, insecure, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders bones. She was, after all, a “normal” American, the kind of person (or so I’m told) you meet in flyover country. The kind that worries first about home and hearth and believes in things like motherhood and love of country the way it is, not the way she wants to remake it.

What you clowns need, in other words, is a Rules for Radical Conservatives to explain what you’re up against and teach you how to compete before it’s too late. Luckily, since I care about money even more than I care about politics, I have just such a book in the proposal stage, currently making the rounds of various publishers, assuming any of them are wise enough to take me up on it.

And, yes, this time it really is personal.

http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=NDE3MmE5MDVmMGM1YjQ2NmVhMjJkN2I2ZTcxMzhlNjU=

 

Send This | Categories:
(50) Comments
Posted by: ButtonBoy on July 8, 2009 9:42AM CST
The press was more than willing to assist in the decapitation of Palin. But let us not forget some of the garbage put out there by our own side, Blue-blood, establishment REPUBLICANS (not conservatives) who were also threatened by her appeal to regular folks and moved to marginalize her. You expect that from the other side, though not to the degree the other side went.

Shame on the press for joining in on the whole thing by publicizing rumors, innuendo, or flat out lies.

Posted by: Huck Finn on July 8, 2009 11:24AM CST
Trust me, she is doing a two year cram fest, and like the Mummy, will rise from the dead to create new carnage and mayhem to your party. And trust me on this. If you guys foolishly embrace her a second time, only this time as a "Presidential contender," I can assure you another four years of BO.

Posted by: StormyKnight on July 8, 2009 11:43AM CST
Huck- there probably won't be a country by the time BO is done. So what are you worried about?

Posted by: paradigm on July 8, 2009 12:44PM CST
A magnificent piece of satire. I'm glad someone other than myself is on the record with this stuff. Remember [X-file fans], "The Truth Is Out There....."

Posted by: algernon on July 8, 2009 12:49PM CST
If Sarah Palin is just a "dumbo country girl from Alaska" why is she such a threat to the liberals, press, etc?

Posted by: Bigfoot on July 8, 2009 1:36PM CST
She ISN'T a threat. That's just one of the points you can make about her. She was touted by McCain as worthy to be the vice-president of the U. S. of A. and what did we get from her? A pretty face and a political novice who has just shown us she can't go the distance. Her only real threat was to a comedian who mistook her teen-aged daughter for her adult daughter. Is that ALL she's going to be remembered for? I know she'll make some good money talking on the Republican event cuircuit, but will she return to run for office? Well, I for one am not going to hold my breath.

Posted by: Mr B on July 8, 2009 1:49PM CST
Wow - anyone notice the slams on Mccain who got his "Lon Chaney/eyegore" appearance while being tortured in Hanoi. I guess if it is written by a right wing hack then bashing someone bearing the scars of service isn't such an outrage.

Other than that pretty well written although the whole equating the Democratic Party to a criminal enterprise is a bit over the top.

Regarding Palin - She will spend the next two years figuring out if she is really a viable candidate (why do you think she arranged to pick up reporters to go fishing with her and her family for interviews this week (yeah right she was tired of the publicity)). Then drag her Joe Six Pack, Main street comments out and see what the primary results in. That will be interesting because if she is a viable candidate I will enjoy watching how the other Republicans treat her.

Posted by: algernon on July 8, 2009 2:04PM CST
Aw c'mon bigfoot, surely you must admit the press is considering her a threat. Why else would they send reporters to Alaska in droves? Surely, it isn't because she is pretty.

If the truth is known, the democratic party sent their hounds up there to start all the hoopla about her ethics which cost her thousands of dollars to defend herself, and she has been cleared.

A pretty face? Actually, I think she is beautiful, and I give her a lot of credit for taking on the governor's job with 5 children-one autistic.

And if nobody is worried about her, then they should be happy in the democratic party that the republicans were so dumb they offered up a political novice, with no hope of winning.

The "comedian" thing. Forget it. We all have. Letterman just lost a lot of viewers over it, that's all.


Posted by: Mr B on July 8, 2009 2:56PM CST
Algemon - Actually she invited them to go fishing, picked them up and planned to have boats available to them.

Regarding being a threat I don't think it was that other than she was a very different candidate and it generated lots of publicity.


Posted by: Bottom Line on July 8, 2009 3:16PM CST
Nice post Stormy.

Truth is, viable leaders continue to find the positions we need to fill, not worth the effort. So we get mediocrity, or worse.


Posted by: DobberDeeDee on July 8, 2009 5:28PM CST
I don't care much for Sarah Palin. I think she is bad for the Republican party now, but I don't think she deserves being dumped on by the press or other Republicans.

She is not a viable candidate for president, not because of anything she has done, or not done, but because of the way the press has ridiculed her. They have turned her into a joke, and there is no way to fight that.

It's just like the Apple ads against Microsoft. You'd never know from those ads that Microsoft has over 80% of the market share, would you? They are beating Apple's brains out, so Apple strikes back the only way they can, with ridicule.

If they wanted to, they could also ridicule Michelle Obama just as much; but they leave her alone....there could be all kinds of jokes about moving the MIL into the WH, never wearing any sleeves to show off her guns, the time she called us all "whitey".....and on and on...It just depends on whom the bullies want to go after.

In this case, the bullies went after Palin, and as far as I am concerned, they won, and she is done. Stick a fork in it.

What this shows is the desperation of the left....THEY ARE AFRAID OF HER......she is extremely popular, and they fear that popularity.

And Mr. B. I am sure I could invite a ton of reporters to go fishing with me, but none would show up. HA! THEY WANT TO BE THERE!

Course, I don't look anything like Sarah (too bad.)

Posted by: algernon on July 8, 2009 5:36PM CST
Mr. B, I am not talking about the Andrea Mitchell thing. I am saying that Alaska has been overflowing with reporters ever since the day they heard the name Sarah Palin.

She did a good job of cleaning up corruption in her state--even got a senator from her own party ousted for his corrupt actions. And Chicago politics doesn't like that. Chicago politics want a cap and trade bill. They don't want a clean natural gas pipeline coming down from Alaska and solving most of our energy problems. NO, NO. That wouldn't be good! They would have less reason for a cap and trade tax.

I have been trying to make a concerted effort to be civil when I post a comment on these blogs, but it is getting more difficult with you and bigfoot.

I agree; it will be interesting how many feathers she ruffles in the Republican party. They did not treat her well in the McCain campaign.

Posted by: 2brnt2b on July 8, 2009 6:50PM CST
Sarah doesn't need the approval of people she doesn't approve of.

Posted by: algernon on July 8, 2009 6:54PM CST
I just saw on t.v. that the millionaire Pickens is starting a big wind farm, and he is promoting "clean natural gas" for all automobiles. He claims it will clean up the air in no time. Anybody else see that report?

Posted by: Bigfoot on July 8, 2009 9:53PM CST
algemon--I know how you feel. It is so frustrating trying to make honest statements about an issue, and then having people lie and deceive and delete you for not agreeing with them and calling them out on their lies and decept. Ask DDD and AWBC why they condemn a liberal for using the word "retarded" and demand his apology but they use and defend the use of the same word but won't apologize for it? Why all the hate from the right? Why do conservative values include not facing up to the truth? It's so frustrating trying to have an honest discussion on a topic but don't get any honesty from so many of the conservatives!


Posted by: AWBC on July 9, 2009 5:28AM CST
BF,

In the CONTEXT I used the word, and I used it ONCE, was to convey that the people who voted a SECOND time for JIm Doyle were 'retarded' in their thinking, as in SLOW LEARNERS. I will not apologize for the proper use of a word in the engllish language, teach. In the CONTEXT of the article written by the slimeball at HuffPo was making fun of a DOWN'S SYNDROME BABY. Does your mind grasp the difference between the two?

Posted by: Bigfoot on July 9, 2009 8:20AM CST
Yes, my mind grasps your condescending statements. Does your mind grasp that calling someone "retarded" is an insult under ANY CONTEXT?

Posted by: Poguey on July 9, 2009 8:37AM CST
I have two beefs with Sarah Palin, and I'm not sure if they outweigh her significant positives.

First, this resigning move is wrong, politically and otherwise. There are lots of folks out there who believe that you don't walk away from a job before it's done. Ever. So that maybe will and maybe should be the end of her political aspirations.

Prior to this move, though, my only real issue with her was that, during the campaign, when it counted, she was unable to admit that maybe she just doesn't know everything. The simple truth is that no governor seeking national office will have an intimiate, working knowledge of foreign policy--she was no less qualified in that area, though, than any of the other governors we've elected. Rather than just address that straight on, though, when the press asked her questions with the specific intent to trip her up--yes that was wrong, but they did the same thing to Bush and we on the right have to recognize that the press no longer cares to play fair when it comes to conservatives--she tried to bluff her way out of it and ended up looking bafoonish (again, like Bush, who I think was right more often than not but alienated lots of folks by being unable or unwilling to explain himself). If she would've just said, "Ya know, I don't know that specifically, but my general principals are XYZ and I'll apply those principals and work darned hard, as I always have, to represent America to the best of my ability," I think most people (at least where we live) would've flocked to the honesty, even as those on the coasts and in the media would've mocked her--which, of course, they did anyhow.

What I really LOVE about her, though, is that even her detractors would have to admit she is NOT an elitist. And that's really why they hate her, because she represents the possiblity that maybe the leadership of this nation won't always be controlled by those who went to Yale or Harvard or who've won over the media centers of New York or DC. I think any impartial observer would have to admit that the coverage of her was tinged with more than a little snobbery--Wasilla for God's sake!--from both the left and those on the right who always hated Ronald Reagan for the same reason. That's why she's an existential threat to them. She doesn't fit the mold of the "leadership class."

Posted by: ButtonBoy on July 9, 2009 8:43AM CST
I'm not offended by the proper use of a word in the english language. Maybe you took the comment too personally. What if the word was 'deficient'. Would that have been better? Both words mean the same thing.

Posted by: Poguey on July 9, 2009 8:50AM CST
And her acceptance speech was far and away the best political speech I've ever seen. With so much pressure on and such a national stage, with EVERYONE tuning in to see how this unknown would handle herself, she knocked the ball right out of the park and straight into the chest of the status quo. Kahane was right--you could actually see the fear/shock/confusion/hatred in the reaction of the establishment covering the event. It even took Obama a few days to regain his footing. It really could've been a game-changer, were it not for the press and McCain himself, SHE may well have won that election.

Posted by: Zapotlanejo on July 9, 2009 9:02AM CST
Actually using the word "Retarded" is very offensive to alot of people including those that care for people with a disability, such as myself (professionally and personally) and those that are disabled. I think it is an overused, misappropriated word in alot of settings.

Posted by: algernon on July 9, 2009 9:24AM CST
Yes Zap, it is offensive. But it has become a part of the slang teenagers use all the time. I have heard many kids use that term when they don't like or agree with one of their peers. It's our culture which has "gone to hell in a handbasket." And it's not right

Posted by: algernon on July 9, 2009 9:28AM CST
You are right poguey. Even my liberal friends, who watched that speech were amazed! And I saw the face of Chris Matthews after that speech. He was almost speechless!

Posted by: Raytown4life on July 9, 2009 1:59PM CST
Did I just read that Sarah Palin's speech "was far and away the best political speech I've ever seen?" What about JFK's inaugural speech, MLK's "I Have a Dream," John Adams' speech to the 1st Continental Congress, Reagan's many great speeches to the public during his presidency, including his "Tear this wall down" statement, (not a fan of the man but he was an excellent speaker), Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, Susan B. Anthony's "On Women's Right to Vote," FDR's D-Day Speech (sorry, not sure if it had a specific title), Woodrow Wilson's "Fourteen Points" (horrid man but excellent document and speech)...it seems to me compared to some of these remarkable works, Palin's is pretty insignificant.

Posted by: DobberDeeDee on July 9, 2009 2:00PM CST
The best face of all was Andrea Mitchell's. She was almost drowned by balloons.....it was hysterical! Would have made a GREAT SNL skit - - - oh, wait, that's not PC.

Posted by: DobberDeeDee on July 9, 2009 2:01PM CST
Hey Raytown - the eye of the beholder....or in this case the ear....HA

Posted by: Mr B on July 9, 2009 4:04PM CST
Algemon - I have no idea why you have an issue with being civil. I don't think I have been personal about much of anything although I don't agree with your viewpoint.

Posted by: Mr B on July 9, 2009 4:07PM CST
DDD - The difference is Michelle is not the candidate Palin was. And I really don't think Michelle said nearly as humerous things like "We can see Russia out our back door". You have to admit some of her faux pas were kind of easy to joke about.

By the way i did see an SNL skit re: Michelle Obama. Not very funny but they did try.

Posted by: Bottom Line on July 9, 2009 8:08PM CST
True, Mr B, like visiting all 57 states.

Posted by: Bottom Line on July 9, 2009 8:09PM CST
... oh, that's right, "HE" wasn't running for VP either!

Posted by: MC on July 9, 2009 10:00PM CST
Bigfoot has a new word - "condescending" thanks to Maurice. Thank God, for I was really getting tired of "attack" and "(can't remember the other right now)". SHEEESH!

Posted by: StormyKnight on July 9, 2009 11:14PM CST
algernon- I didn't see the report you're referring to but I saw Pickens interviewed the other day and it was said in a 'matter of fact' fashion when he was introduced that he owns land in Texas with an abundance of natural gas on it. While he comes across as sincere and I appreciate his concern for the money we contribute to foreign entities by way of buying oil but I now question the sincerity of his motives.

Posted by: Mr B on July 10, 2009 7:09AM CST
SK - His plan was well publicized and he is a billionaire many times over. Natural Gas is cleaner to use and by using it more oftem maybe we can avoid some of the entanglements of the middle east.

Posted by: 2Ball on July 10, 2009 8:26AM CST
The left is so fearful of her... She is way more appealing and powerful, smarter, etc. that Hillary and Pelosi combined.

She'd tell Pelosi to shut up and sit down.

She'd put Barbra Boxer on a leash and tie her to a tree.

Posted by: Poguey on July 10, 2009 8:59AM CST
Raytown--I didn't say hers was the best speech by a politician ever, I said it was the best political speech I ever heard. I don't consider all speeches by politicians to be political speeches--some actually deal with substance, though increasingly few. A vice-presidential acceptance speech, though, is about as political as they come--it's all about "red meat" for the convention delegates. Hers not only did that in a HUGE way, it also gave McCain's entire campaign a jolt of life (and McCain's campaign otherwise never rose above life support level) the likes of which liberals and the media couldn't help but acknowledge--and fear. Now, there may well have been better political speeches along the way (I'm only in my mid-30s), but I've been a political junkie my whole life and hers was easily the best I've seen. Heck, I had it on my iPod for a few months!

Posted by: Dr. Awkward on July 10, 2009 3:06PM CST
Sarah Palin could have proven to be a considerable threat to Democrats in the near future.

Then John McCain picked her as his running mate.

Posted by: DobberDeeDee on July 10, 2009 9:52PM CST
Well, at least Sarah Palin did not go on National TV and say her bowling was so bad that it looked like the Special Olympics.

And she doesn't need to say "ah", "um", "ah", "um", "aaaahhh", "ummmm" every 2 seconds.

You know, we are so fair in the media, we hold EVERYONE to the same standards.

Just once, I wish the people who hate Sarah Palin would admit she has not gotten a fair deal from the press. Or do you all think she has gotten a fair deal?

Posted by: MC on July 10, 2009 10:47PM CST
She has shown just how much class she really has by rising above the media/left tarshing of her and her family. When the arrogant elite self-centered dupus on the Late Show went over the top with his "joke", even then she repremanded him with class and dignity. Qualities you don't find in women on the left.

Posted by: MC on July 10, 2009 10:50PM CST
Make that "trashing" and not tarshing.

Posted by: algernon on July 11, 2009 8:38AM CST
Stormy, I am aware that Pickens is a very rich man and owns lots of property in Texas rich with natural gas. And I am aware that Pickens may have a motive of his own. But if we were to make use of all the natural gas in this country (Alaska, Texas) and elsewhere, we could clean up the air and avoid all this cap and tax crap. Not to mention the demise of OPEC, which has been our noose for so many years.

Posted by: algernon on July 11, 2009 8:46AM CST
Good blog Stormy. I wish everyone would leave Sarah alone although it's not going to happen. She wants a natural gas pipeline from Alaska to the lower 48, which would provide jobs and clean fuel for our country. The government doesn't want that. They would much rather impose a big carbon tax on people.

But I hope Sarah persists on this. She can do more when she is not governor where she would accused of being political. Perhaps this was the REAL reason for her resignation.

Posted by: algernon on July 11, 2009 9:49AM CST
Mr B, Perhaps Sarah CAN see Russia out her back door--ever notice those glasses? And Dr. Awkward the implication that John's McCain picked her as her running mate, thereby causing the fall of Sarah Palin is far fetched. It was the liberal press that caused it. And they still fear her. That's why she is in the news constantly. But to trash her children is below the belt, and the press has lost a lot of credibility which won't heal very soon.

Posted by: Dr. Awkward on July 11, 2009 1:00PM CST
Algernon - Was Sarah Palin not involved in politics before the presidential election? She hitched her wagon to a falling star. If she had passed on McCain's offer, she would still be rising quietly. Perhaps as the secret weapon of the newly energized right.

I heard an intersting question: between an ancient Senator running a long-shot election for president (meaning conservatives didn't even like him), and a young governor just starting out in politics that seemed to be the up-and-coming hero of the right, who would have thought the latter would be the first to retire?

"I'm a fighter, not a quitter" she said -- as she quit. Don't you think it's possible she's just a hockey mom after all, not the pitbull you wanted her to be? I suppose time will tell which she really is. Ironically, one of the set of reasons her supporters are giving why it makes sense that she quit (needs time with her family, has a special-needs child) are the very things they blasted those on the left for giving why she should not be president. I'm getting dizzy from all this flip-flopping.

Posted by: MC on July 11, 2009 1:22PM CST
Dr. - you love to go into long explainations, so could you explain how you know this; (or is it just an opinion?)
" If she had passed on McCain's offer, she would still be rising quietly. Perhaps as the secret weapon of the newly energized right."

Do you have one of those "crystal balls" bigfoot is always accusing the right of using? Plaese try and keep it under 10 paragraphs. :) (I'm actually serious about the 1st question)

Posted by: algernon on July 11, 2009 2:06PM CST
Dr. Awk, Maybe if she would have turned down the offer from a "falling star" as you describe McCain, and had taken her time, and had risen to be the secret weapon of the newly energized right, do you think the liberal press would not have done the same?

Posted by: MauriceH. on July 12, 2009 12:08AM CST
I don't hate her. I hope she runs and gets the GOP nomination in 2012.

Posted by: algernon on July 12, 2009 10:15AM CST
Maurice, Good for you. It's not good to hate. I'm very sure you hope she runs because you think she has no chance of winning. That might be true, but so far our country is free so let's let the chips fall where they may.

Posted by: Poguey on July 16, 2009 5:23PM CST
Careful what you wish for, Maurice...

Posted by: Poguey on July 16, 2009 5:27PM CST
After all, I'd bet that you would've bet dollars to donuts that we wouldn't have been stupid enough to elect W twice. We have now established the precedent that rhetorical skills are more essential for the office than experience, and she's a helluva speaker, even without a teleprompter. That would be a heck of an exciting election to watch.

Posted by: ugg boots on July 21, 2009 2:31AM CST
Thank you for your article, the contents of the following which you will like.Cheap Jordan shoes,UGG Boots, Nike SB,Tiffany Rings, Nike Dunk,Tiffany Jewelry for Sale.Who is also a useful information: Nike Dunk SB,Nike SB for Sale ,Gucci Shoes,Christian Louboutin,Bose headphones.

Loading...
About This Blog
3 rating(s)

Latest Entries
Loading...
Links
Loading...
Report Photos