|
GinaB's Blog
Loading...
Warning: This blog is about the online activity surrounding the recent tragic loss of a fellow Racinian. It is in casual conversation form, not intended for memorial purposes. Please do not read this if you feel it will offend you.
Posted by:
GinaB on
December 5, 2008 at
3:08PM CST
After
several days of family members and friends requesting that journaltimes remove
or block the blogs attached to the articles about a young student's recent suicide,
they have somewhat succeeded. They have managed to accomplish what others
who requested this same thing for their own loved ones could not. The
articles have disappeared. Normally,
articles "time out" of the top news stories section after just a few
days, but remain in the archive for further viewing. Not so with these
articles. They are simply gone. Articles
regarding other victims, who were often viciously slandered in the blogs,
remain accessible. (Examples: Ann Larson, T.J. Melendez, Autumn Ford,
Ronald Stapleton, Ahatolla Feemster) This continued accessibility
demonstrates that the decision to delete the aforementioned articles was
applied selectively. So, what determining
factors did the journaltimes consider when making this decision? Perhaps they
felt that because it was a suicide, it should be treated with greater care
considering the impact on family and friends of the deceased. The problem with this theory is that I
searched the word “suicide” on the journaltimes archives and discovered plenty
of stories regarding suicide victims from Racine, Sturtevant and Kenosha. There have also been stories about attempted
suicides. About one year ago, the
journaltimes even put out a request for people who had lost a loved one to
suicide for a potential story. So, until
this moment, journaltimes.com has NEVER treated a story about a suicide any
differently than any other story. In addition,
considering the impact on family and friends has NEVER been a priority of
journaltimes before. The family and
friends of murder victims are just as impacted by the loss of their loved ones
as those whose loved ones committed suicide.
To treat one group differently than the other infers that one event is
more tragic than the other. If the JT is considering family/friend impact as a
reason in this decision, then they would have to begin using that across the
board – with all victims. Perhaps they
felt that, since so many “members” of the site were requesting it, they should
oblige – out of good customer service.
The problem with this argument is that many of the people who were
requesting it were new members, who will probably never visit this site
again. They came to post once or twice,
then left altogether. Therefore, the
impact of this decision is not felt by these individuals, but by the customers
who have stood by journaltimes for longer periods of time. So, why
would JT make this decision? The only
reasons that make sense are power and privilege. Never before has a murder or suicide that involved
an individual with such affluent connections been made so public in
Racine. This young man was a student at
Prairie, a school where many of our “upper-class” Racinians send their children
for education. We are talking about
business owners, policy makers, CEOs, executives, etc – people who have “pull”
in our community. It looks like they may
have “pulled”. Why do I
care so much? If erasing
the news can happen once, then it can happen more than once. When power and privilege can dictate what news
is accessible to the general public, then the objectivity of a news industry is
compromised. It is the obligation of a
news source to offer accurate, objective information, untainted by the
influences of the more powerful in the community – and regardless of the tension
that it may cause. I’m not sure I can
trust the JT to do that anymore. How
will I know, in the future, whether my news has been pre-filtered for me by
outside suggestions from powerful people?
Am I
disrespecting the young man about whom the original story was written? If it is not
already obvious, this blog isn’t about that young man. It is about the argument and resulting
decision surrounding the articles. It is
about freedom of speech, freedom of press, and our right to demand a newspaper
that considers accuracy and objectivity more important than the influence of
power and privilege.
Send This | Categories:
(55) Comments
|
About This Blog
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 0 rating(s)
Older Posts
Latest Entries
Loading...
|



